Magazine, The Immigrant Experience
In 2022, the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, launched Project 2025, a sweeping initiative aimed at radically reshaping the U.S. federal government by consolidating executive power if a favored presidential candidate is elected. The ambitious policy blueprint has raised alarms among legal experts and advocates, who warn it promotes autocratic tendencies, undermines the separation of powers, erodes civil liberties, and poses a significant threat to democracy.
The dangers inherent in Project 2025 were the focus of a recent briefing hosted by Ethnic Media Services (EMS), where experts explored its far-reaching implications for immigrant rights, reproductive rights, and LGBTQIA+ rights. Drawing on a detailed analysis from the AAPI Equity Alliance, panelists painted a concerning picture of how the proposed policies could alter the legal landscape in the United States. Key speakers included Manjusha P. Kulkarni, Executive Director of the AAPI Equity Alliance; Sulma Arias, Executive Director of People’s Action Institute; Yvonne Gutierrez, Chief Strategy Officer of Reproductive Freedom for All; and Tony Hoang, Executive Director of Equality California.
Manjusha Kulkarni opened the discussion by highlighting the existential threat Project 2025 poses to immigrant communities, particularly Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders (AAPIs). Her organization, which represents over 1.6 million AAPIs in Los Angeles County, meticulously reviewed the 900-page policy document. Findings revealed proposals aimed at restricting immigrant rights, expanding mass deportation capabilities, and granting broad powers to federal immigration agents. Kulkarni pointed out how Project 2025 employs inflammatory rhetoric, such as “illegal aliens” and “infiltration,” which echo xenophobic tropes that can incite hate and violence against immigrant populations.
The proposed policies could enable ICE agents to conduct home raids without judicial warrants, disproportionately impacting communities of color. The initiative threatens to dismantle family-based immigration, reduce H-1B visas—crucial for skilled immigrants, especially from India—and jeopardize the future of Dreamers, increasing the risk of deportation and family separation.
In addition to immigration concerns, Project 2025 aims to roll back vital protections for LGBTQIA+ individuals and reproductive rights. Yvonne Gutierrez and Tony Hoang emphasized that the proposed measures would erode protections in healthcare, employment, and education for LGBTQIA+ people, while also threatening access to abortion and reproductive healthcare for millions. If enacted, these policies could reverse decades of civil rights advancements, leaving marginalized communities—immigrants, women, and LGBTQIA+ individuals—vulnerable to discrimination and violence.
The briefing stressed the necessity for communities to stay informed and proactive in countering the extremist agenda outlined in Project 2025. As Kulkarni concluded, advocates must raise awareness of the plan’s far-reaching consequences and mobilize efforts to protect at-risk populations from its sweeping proposals.
Sulma Arias, Executive Director of People’s Action Institute, underscored the urgency of engaging undecided voters in the upcoming election, aiming to reach nearly half a million unregistered or conflicted voters in key states like Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona. He highlighted the critical gap in awareness regarding Project 2025, noting a lack of educational outreach, particularly in Spanish. Arias characterized Project 2025 as a collection of ideas aligned with corporate interests, primarily those supported by the Heritage Foundation, and warned of its potential to exacerbate fears and intimidation among vulnerable communities.
Drawing from his experiences leading the Fair Immigration Reform Movement, Arias shared alarming anecdotes of past policies that have dehumanized and divided families. He cautioned that Project 2025 could lead to the privatization of essential public services, such as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the National Weather Service, which are crucial for disaster response and climate-related challenges. He also linked the project to broader societal issues, including increased healthcare costs and the potential elimination of protections for individuals with pre-existing conditions.
Arias concluded by calling for proactive discussions on Project 2025, urging participants to understand its implications and mobilize against its implementation.
Yvonne Gutierrez passionately addressed the urgent threats posed by Project 2025, framing it as a direct assault on reproductive rights and democracy. She highlighted her organization’s commitment to advocating for abortion rights, birth control access, parental leave, and pregnancy protections. Gutierrez warned that Project 2025 serves as a “blueprint to decimate our fundamental rights,” citing proposals within the document that threaten access to abortion, contraception, and fertility treatments.
Gutierrez pointed out that the agenda relies on misinformation and outdated stereotypes, such as the assertion that life begins at conception, which could restrict access to vital reproductive healthcare services. She illustrated the human impact of these policies with the poignant story of a woman in Florida who, facing a cancer diagnosis and pregnancy, struggled to find a provider for an abortion due to restrictive state laws. This anecdote underscored the urgent need to oppose Project 2025.
Tony Hoang detailed the alarming implications of Project 2025 for the LGBTQ+ community, describing the agenda as a “wrecking ball” targeting civil rights. He noted the significant involvement of nearly 100 staffers from the Trump administration in shaping Project 2025 and highlighted the influence of organizations like the Heritage Foundation, known for their longstanding opposition to LGBTQ+ equality.
Central to Hoang’s critique was the agenda’s focus on transgender individuals, equating transgender identity with pornography and advocating for its criminalization. He warned of potential federal funding cuts for gender-affirming care, affecting both minors and adults, and noted the implications for healthcare workers who might refuse care based on religious objections.
Hoang also addressed the impact on youth, stating that the policies would exacerbate challenges for transgender students and strip federal support from educational institutions affirming transgender identities. He expressed concerns about the rollback of protections established by the landmark Bostock decision, which expanded workplace protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
The briefing concluded with Hoang calling for solidarity and vigilance against the threats posed by Project 2025, urging allies to recognize the real-world consequences of these proposed policies and advocate for the protection of LGBTQ+ rights.
Yvonne Gutierrez reiterated the call for awareness and action against the dangers of Project 2025, emphasizing that the majority of Americans support access to abortion and reproductive freedom. She urged attendees to understand the implications of the agenda on real lives and families, reinforcing the need to protect and advocate for reproductive rights as a fundamental aspect of democracy.
#Project2025 #ImmigrantRights #LGBTQRights #ReproductiveRights #CivilLiberties #Democracy #HumanRights #StandUpForEquality #DefendDemocracy #ProtectOurCommunities #StopTheHate #CommunityEngagement #AAPIEquity #VoterAwareness #SocialJustice
